Chess articles of any kind: games, tournament reports, web sites, ... |
December 19, 2003StalemateHello Playchess pals. I have created a big database with all HCL games played in this site, and I intend to report regularly on many chess related topics, based on the completed games from this site. In order to experiment with this absolutely new for me task, I decided to start with the quite entertaining conclusion of a game of chess: The stalemate. During 2003 in Human Chess League 16 games ended with stalemate. I am going to present you 4 cases. Most endgame studies with a few pieces on the board advice to double check carefully our next move in order to avoid a stalemate. The defending King is usually near the border and an attacking Rook or Queen guards all escaping squares. Most stalemates just happen in such a position after a careless move. The first example is characteristic.
Can you find a mate in 2?
What a pity, because after 54.h8R Black has only one available move: 54.Ka1 and 55.Rh1#.
Black blunders his 46th move. He should have played 46.f4. After 47.Ke4 Ke6 48.Kd4 Kd6 39.Ke4 Kc5 has managed to advance his King to the 5th rank leaving White with a doubt which is the best way to delay checkmate. Yet, he played 46... fxg4+. After 47.Kxg4 the game is drawn. However, White presents an excellent technique to achieve this target. After 47... Kg6 his retreats without leaving g-file 48.Kg3 and after 48... Kf5 he takes the opposition with 49.Kf3.
Any other move is bad for White. Black advances the pawn 49... g4+ and an identical cycle of moves repeat: 50.Kg3 Kg5 51.Kg2 Kf4 52.Kf2.
The cycle repeats once again: 52... g3+ 53.Kg2 Kg4 54.Kg1 Kf3 55.Kf1. Black advances the pawn 55... g2+ 56.Kg1.
Black has two choices. He either abandons pawn protection or plays 56... Kg3 stalemate, offering me the chance to remind you of basic pawn endgame positions.
Black has just one move available: b7-b6. In any other case 37.R1d7 would be considered as an exemplary pin, reducing the mobility of the opponent. But the position requires a different way of thinking. Considering the zugzwang, White should search for a move that mates the opponent after he plays b7-b6. If no such move can be found, he must allow Black's next move by removing the Queen or the Rook from the 6th and 8th rank respectively. Yet, the mating move exists: Qg6-h7. So, a waiting move is necessary: 37.e4 or 37.g5 or 37.h5 have the same result 37...b6 38.Qh7#.
Black has a huge material advantage. Notice that White can move only one piece: his Queen. He sets a beautiful trap by playing 52.Qe5. Black decides to take the Queen for free and dominate the board after 52... Rxe5. Alas! The game is over: Stalemate. Posted by Michalis Kaloumenos at December 19, 2003 08:47 PMComments
It happened to me too. In this game:http://www.playchess.de/games/HCL-C1763-13 I had a huge advantage, but I was too greedy and captured a pawn, which caused stalemate. Aaargh!! Well there is an advantage if you make such a move: you will never forget this in the future. Posted by: Dutchin at December 19, 2003 11:12 PMGentlemen, Thanks for this, I'm not a good chessplayer. But comments like this helps me a lot to learn ! Ronan48 Posted by: Ronan48 at December 20, 2003 06:07 PMSee how pietros won a stalemate against me. Very good article, and a instructional essay on basic pawn endings. Enjoyed it thoroughly. Posted by: marvinni at December 22, 2003 10:53 AMSo far I've annotated only one game: HCL-B2045-13 was sure lost after 26 moves. After 28 moves a had a sure stalemate (recurring position due to infinte check). My opponent made me even win this game in which I was only playing a little more to see how he would break my neck. Posted by: Ezechiel at December 22, 2003 10:59 AM I love chess tasks of Lloyd - they're more fantasy than reality, but they're very entertaining. So I want to post some similar tasks regarding stalemate: In all solutions White and Black should collaborate, of course. Regards, Dmitry Posted by: Dmitry (golddim) at December 23, 2003 10:06 AMI was under the illusion that stalemate was after a player looses all of rooks, queen, bishops, and knights, there is a certain number of moves before a stalemate. This is not what I have found to be true, is there another rule that those I was playing were speaking of. Thank you Posted by: Well Meaner at January 7, 2004 08:39 PMDoes a stalte mate become the same as winning the match Posted by: herb singer at April 12, 2004 12:25 PMOh, yesterday I played against my PC. I was dominating the chess board; in fact, I'd promoted three pawns to queens! But the computer managed to cause a Stalemate (the last pawn I promoted). Before reading this topic, I though that a stalemate means that the player who can't move lose automatically the game. Now I see that it's false! So, it's a pleasure seeing the way that great masters use to stalemate to draw a game in which their probabilities to win are obviously lesser than the opponnents' ones. |
Links
Find articles
Archives
January 2007
December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 June 2004 May 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 Categories
Chess news
Chess philosophy Chess puzzles Community Recognition Game analysis Interviews PlayChess Open Stories Tips and tricks Tournament reports Recent Entries
Spotlight on Class M - December 2006
December 2006 Recognition Spotlight on Class E - November 2006 Thoughts upon a position: 8. The deciding move November 2006 Thoughts upon a position: 7. A Greek gem Thoughts upon a position: 6. Strong Combinational Vision Recent Comments
|